Cardiac Troponin I
For Investigational Use Only. Performance characteristics of this product have not been established.
The VeriSens Cardiac Troponin I Test is a gold nanoparticle-based immunoassay with silver signal enhancement for the quantitative determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels in human serum and heparinized plasma using the Verigene System.
BACKGROUND
Cardiac troponin (cTnI or cTnT) has been labeled the “biomarker of choice” for detecting cardiac damage. Measurement of cardiac troponin is a central tool in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
Troponin (Tn) is the central regulatory protein of striated muscle contraction. The cardiac Tn complex (cTn) consists of three proteins: cTnI (unprocessed: 24,008 Da) which is the inhibitor of actomyosin ATPase, cTnT (35,924 Da) which contains the binding site for tropomyosin, and cTnC (the “slow” non-skeletal form, 18,403 Da). The binding of calcium to cTnC abolishes the inhibitory action of cTn on actin filaments. Together, in the heart, they play a fundamental role in the transmission of intracellular calcium signals and the actin-myosin interaction (Opie 2008).
cTnI has additional amino acid residues on its N-terminal that do not exist on the skeletal forms of troponin thus making cTnI a specific marker of myocardial necrosis. cTnI is released rapidly into the blood with the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and therefore, has become the biomarker of choice in the diagnosis and risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Levels of cTnI can remain elevated for up to 6 - 10 days (Antman and Braunwald 2008).
MI is caused by rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque in a coronary artery, leading to platelet aggregation and thrombus formation to an extent that oxygenation of the myocardial tissue is completely interrupted (i.e., total occlusion). This causes some degree of myocardial necrosis (Cannon and Lee 2008). High concentrations of cardiac enzymes and proteins (e.g., cardiac troponin I or T [cTnI or cTnT], CK-MB, myoglobin) are observed in blood as the result of significant irreversible injury to cardiac tissue distal to the site of rupture and secondary to arterial occlusion. Current assays can detect ST-segment elevated myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and non-ST-segment elevated myocardial infarctions (NSTEMIs). By definition of the 2007 AHA/ACC updated guidelines for NSTEMI and unstable angina (UA), the NSTEMI threshold is defined as the 99th percentile upper reference limit [URL] of a cardiac troponin (cTn) assay’s reference range in a healthy subject population (Thygesen, et al 2007).
Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality among industrialized nations. In the U.S., there are nearly 100 million adults who suffer from cardiovascular disease. Over 8 million patients present to emergency departments (EDs) annually with a chief complaint consistent with ACS. A majority of these patients are found to be experiencing non-cardiac chest pain (i.e., about 70-82% of patients). Myocardial infarction (NSTEMIs = 6-10% of patients and STEMIs = 2-5% of patients) occurs in about 8-15% of these patients. UA, which is often a precursor condition to MI, accounts for 10-15% of patients. Together, MI plus UA combine to define ACS (= about 18-30% patients) [American Heart Association website: www.americanheart.org].
As many as 2-4% of patients with MI (about 24,000-48,000 patients annually) are discharged from the ED with an associated short-term mortality of 10% to 26% (Duseja and Feldman 2004). These patients are perhaps best classified as “false negatives” (i.e., FNs).
Missed acute cardiac ischemia is one of the major causes of malpractice litigation against emergency physicians (Duseja and Feldman 2004). Even though chest pain patients (and other patients with symptoms consistent with ACS) represent only 6% of the ED patient volume, it has been estimated that 20% of ED-related malpractice dollars are expended for ischemic heart disease complications (Rusnak, et al 1989; Jesse and Kontos 1997). Therefore, the misdiagnosis of ischemic cardiac injury is of great importance from a human life and economic perspective.
In the typical hospital ED today, cardiac biomarkers are drawn and the results are back to the ED physician within about 90 minutes (i.e., therapeutic turnaround time [TTAT]; “vein to brain” time). Some hospitals have implemented point-of-care devices that can provide results within 10-15 minutes, although their relatively lower sensitivity (URL – ≥ 0.080 ng/mL) can significantly delay diagnosis and treatment compared to other methods. At the other end of the spectrum, some EDs that are still dependent on the central laboratory that have a therapeutic turnaround time of 2-4 hours.
In the absence of definitive diagnostic information (e.g., cTnI biomarker elevation, diagnostic ECG, and/or other data), many chest pain patients that continue to have discomfort and other symptoms consistent with ACS are held in the ED or chest pain (observation) unit for >6 to <24 hours, before discharge, allowing for serial cardiac markers and continued observation. Therefore, subsequent generations of cTnI assay development have sought to increase sensitivity without compromising specificity (e.g., URL ~ 0.040 ng/mL down from 0.100 ng/mL) to positively impact this cardiac care timeline in the ED.
The universal definition of myocardial infarction as updated and published in the November 27, 2007, issue of Circulation (Thygesen et al 2007) states that any rise or fall of cardiac troponin above an assay’s 99th percentile of a reference range population, with concurrent clinical symptoms of ACS, is considered to be a myocardial infarction. This means that a single cTn value above the 99th percentile threshold, after an earlier value below the threshold, should be labelled a myocardial infarction. Other co-morbid disease processes (e.g., hypertension, CHF, diabetes, cardiotoxicity, myocarditis, etc.) may lead to cTnI elevation. Therefore, it is important to evaluate these co-morbidities that, in themselves, carry an increased risk of cardiac mortality and morbidity.
Workflow
-
STEP 1
Load Test Cartridge, test consumables, and sample into Processor SP
-
STEP 2
Automated sample preparation and test processing on Processor SP
-
STEP 3
Place slide from Test Cartridge in Verigene Reader for results
Literature Cited
-
"Serial changes in high-sensitive troponin I predict outcome in patients with decompensated heart failure."European Journal of Heart Failure01 January 2011Full data13(1):37-42.Abstract
AIMS:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic utility of small troponin I (TnI) elevations, serial TnI measurements, and the combination of TnI and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with decompensated heart failure (HF).
METHODS AND RESULTS:
One hundred and forty-four patients with acute HF were followed from admission to 90 days post-discharge. Primary endpoints were all cause mortality and HF-related readmission. Troponin I and BNP levels were checked on admission, discharge, and up to four consecutive days during hospitalization. A discharge TnI cut-off of 23.25 ng/L and discharge BNP cut-off of 360 ng/L were determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC). Troponin I above 23.25 ng/L is associated with increased risk for mortality and readmission (P = 0.003). Comparing with TnI quartile 1, TnI quartiles 2-4 had increased mortality and readmission, P = 0.019, P = 0.007, P = 0.014, respectively. Compared with patients with low TnI+low BNP, increased mortality and readmission were seen in patients with high TnI+high BNP (P = 0.007), high TnI+low BNP (P = 0.015), and low TnI+high BNP (P = 0.042). Patients with increasing TnI during treatment had increased mortality compared with patients with stable or decreasing TnI (P = 0.047). In multivariate analysis, TnI reached statistical significance (P = 0.009), while BNP did not.
CONCLUSION:
This study demonstrates that very small TnI elevations and BNP elevations are associated with increased 90-day mortality and readmission. When compared by ROC and multivariate analysis, TnI is as good a predictor of mortality and readmission as BNP if not slightly better. Patients with increasing TnI during hospitalization for acute HF had increased risk for 90-day mortality.
-
"Detection of myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina using a novel nanoparticle cardiac troponin I assay: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI 30 Trial."American Heart Journal01 September 2009Full data158(3):386-91.Abstract
BACKGROUND:
At least 30% of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome present without evidence of myonecrosis using current generation troponin assays. A new generation of research assays for troponin that offer a >10-fold increase in analytical sensitivity has emerged.METHODS:
To perform a pilot study to evaluate the clinical sensitivity of a new ultra-sensitive nanoparticle assay for cardiac troponin I (nano-cTnI), we identified 50 patients with unstable angina (serial negative cTnI) and 50 patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction with an initially negative current generation cTnI result. We measured cTnI using an assay (Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) that can detect pg/mL concentrations of cTnI (detection-limit 0.0002 microg/L).RESULTS:
Measured at 0, 2, and 8 hours with the nano-cTnI assay 44%, 62%, and 82% of patients with unstable angina defined by the current-generation assay had an elevated nano-cTnI result (> or =0.003 microg/L, 99 th percentile decision-limit, coefficient of variation <10%). In patients with definite myocardial injury (current-generation cTnI > or =0.1 microg/L) but an initially negative cTnI, 72% and 98% had a nano-cTnI > or =0.003 microg/L at 0 and 2 hours. No patient had a positive current-generation cTnI without an elevated nano-cTnI level.CONCLUSIONS:
In this pilot study using a nanoparticle assay for cTnI, myocardial injury was detectable in a substantial proportion of patients presently classified as having unstable angina, suggesting that ischemia with rest pain without injury is rare. The emergence of a new generation of troponin assays has the potential to lead to new clinical applications based on enhanced analytical performance at very low concentrations of troponin.

